G M Gordon,
Thanks for reply/explanation but with all due respect and understanding the significance of this 206 event plus for all the things you do arranging these races - I am listening to you but somehow I am not hearing and here's what I mean by that ...
This new
IROC procedure/method
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=843 started January 2015 (as you may know) and strange enough, with the same MC (R/Report 184) class which I believe was generated right after/from a MGT (R/Report 183) event and believe you will agree. At the same time - anyone looking back at other
IROC (plus the NSS and SGTC) race reports. One will notice the difference with the these type
4-car or 5-car races compared to a full
6-car racing event - whether or not there's enough marshals.
The point I am making Gordon and you maybe wondering where I am going with this is ... and sorry to say, I find it very drab when any
IROC racing event is shortened. In other words - 5 races for 6 drivers. Hindsight would have it - if 6 races was done per driver at this 206 event, the score sheet with 4 persons (16-16-16-16) wouldn't have been so tight.
Anyway - its notable I wasn't part of the
IROC decision
and ah not beating up about that okay but just making a point now ~ I strongly believe (for other solutions) that no
IROC event (6 races) don't really need to be cut down in this way because of the marshaling situations.
After all and you may remember (not sure which class event though) a race we did sometime ago with
one and only one marshal and I kind of remember it being Marlon when he himself called STOP - not reaching cars in time.
Sure I made myself clear
making a point doing something positive and this happens when I care ...
Luke