Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

All things related to racing at FRC
Post Reply
arden100
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:57 pm
Contact:
Contact arden100

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by arden100 »

Duh!

We lose our cameras off our F1 cars.

Arden
Top
Luke
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:54 pm

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by Luke »

Arden,

Like you didnt get over as yet that very skillful overtake ~ how I put you & Steve away in the 5th. F1 race.. :?:

I havent because it was so spot-on victory sweet that I still keep seeing it :lol:

Luke
Top
Luke
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:54 pm

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by Luke »

Hello Gordon,

Reference FRC's Penalties - I was looking over the DTP RULE and coming to think of it, there is really only one penalty for racing at FRC...

I really dont think you can make it any easier for anyone to adapt, as its written in the GENERAL COMPETITION REGULATIONS... Yet some how for whatever reason/s - we still have issues with it every once in a while.

:arrow: If a car drives through or bounces a car ahead in the same lane causing it to de-slot, or if a car causes another car to de-slot when exiting the pits or changing lane...

The two situations in bold print is very straight forward to comprehend but do you think the changing lane part could do with a little more clarification :?: :)

Luke
Top
Luke
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:54 pm

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by Luke »

GG - Here's a suggestion wording the DTP rule... and not taking away that your way wasnt good too.

If a car drives through or bounces a car ahead in the same lane causing it to de-slot, or if a car exiting the pits or changing lane causes another car to de-slot...

Its still written in your style but because of the bold print here, when reading will "drive" the point home :)

What you think?

Luke
Top
User avatar
gordon
Site Admin
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:34 pm
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Contact:
Contact gordon

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by gordon »

Luke wrote:If a car drives through or bounces a car ahead in the same lane causing it to de-slot, or if a car exiting the pits or changing lane causes another car to de-slot...
Luke,

I couldn't have put it better myself :) I'll change the wording in our regs to your excellent suggestion.

Gordon
Top
RameshB
Posts: 599
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:30 pm

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by RameshB »

Hi guys dont forget TSCC next official race meet is on tommorow sun 13th at 3pm marabella raceway five classes same as last time this is the 2nd event in a three part series , last time luke ,bethany and steve were there ,we would like to invite all to attend, see last events points standing on slotcarclub.com or call ramesh 678 1920 or arden 355 5980. hi boo we missed you last time . bye ramesh
Top
Luke
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:54 pm

Re: Race Report #144 - Thursday 3rd October, 2013

Post by Luke »

My pleasure GG & glad you like the suggestion :D

Although I still think, the changing lane could do with a little more clarification...

For example - If someone makes a lane change for a clean overtake on a slower car and slower car runs into the back of faster car by chance & they (of course slower car) get de-slotted... Would you call this a drive through still :?: This is exactly what happened when I over-taked Arden in last F1 race & you came up from behind and re-slotted him right after 8-)

Whats your take on this GG :?:

On a separate note, Ramesh & Arden sorry I couldnt make TSCC :( & sure you'll had a great time still :)

Luke
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Racing”